Vol. 2, No. 5 | Page 13 | May 2000 |
Interracial Marriage We
received a question recently inquiring what, if anything, the Bible teaches
regarding interracial marriage. After scouring the Bible for applicable
passages, it appears that this is a subject about which mankind exhibits a
greater degree of interest and concern than does our Creator and God. To
be sure, interracial marriage has been and continues to be a societal taboo and
a very emotionally charged topic. However, many interracial marriages that were
formerly considered by some to be an affront to society are no longer
considered so by most people. For instance, marriages between European settlers
who occupied North America and native Americans was frowned upon for about the
first 100 years, but now few people concern themselves with marriages between
the ‘whiteman’ and the ‘redman.’ Following the 19th century wars that affected western
nations and Asia countries (one of the last being the Viet Nam War), marriages
between Caucasians and Asians are fairly commonplace and accepted. Apparently,
the greater the distinction of the pigment of the skin between races, the more reluctant
societal partisans are to appreciate interracial marriages. Yet, tens of
thousands men and women from various races, including black and white, contract
interracial marriages anyway each year. To be sure, societal pressures on such
couples from their peers, friends, neighbors, co-workers, etc. contribute to
the difficulties encountered by newlyweds that may severely test their
marriages and result in divorce. Irrespective, though, of what may be socially
acceptable or pragmatic, what biblical principles affect the topic of interracial
marriages? Two possible biblical references under Patriarchy contain no principles
applicable to the religious age in which we live. (1) Conjecture regarding whether
the “mark” placed on Cain (Genesis 4:15) pertains to race or skin color is inconclusive
and not associated with either religious or social marriage laws. (2) The
scattering of humanity from Babel following their refusal to disburse and
populate the earth was accompanied by God’s conferring differing languages upon
them. Though meting out different races or skin colors by God would seem to be
a useful utility along with the confusion of their languages to help disperse humanity
(and may have occurred then, too), the biblical text makes no mention of race
or skin color in connection with the episode at Babel (Genesis 11:1-9). Yet,
even so, no marriage restrictions inhere in that biblical passage, and since
then, the earth has been sufficiently populated with about six billion souls. Two
biblical concepts under Judaism may be thought to concern interracial marriage.
First, the Jews were required to marry within the nation of Israel to
perpetuate the spiritual promises made to Abraham (i.e., the Messiah, Genesis 12:3),
avoid spiritual corruption (Deuteronomy 7:1-4) and maintain the Jewish heritage
(Numbers 36:5-13). Deuteronomy 7:1-4 prohibited the Jews from marrying the
people in Canaan. This prohibition was based on religious reasons (i.e., that
monotheism would not be corrupted with polytheism). The Jews who returned from Babylonian
captivity mingled “the holy seed” with foreigners (Ezra 9:2), one reason for
which they were compelled to put away those wives and children (Ezra 9-10).
However, the peoples with whom they contracted forbidden marriages were different
from them religiously and nationally ¾ not racially. The principle
regarding the danger of spiritual corruption because of whom one marries continues,
but does not affect the question of racial marriage. Further, it is no longer
necessary for anyone to refrain marrying someone to preserve the lineage of
Abraham until the Messiah comes, since Jesus Christ, our Messiah, has already
come. Therefore, this first consideration has no bearing to the question of
interracial marriage today. Second,
Moses married an Ethiopian woman while Patriarchy was effective and was
subsequently chided by his brother and sister after Judaism had been
implemented. “And
Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had
married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman” (Numbers 11:1). Race and skin
color were issues with Miriam and Aaron for which they challenged Moses for the
leadership of the nation of Israel. The race and skin color of Moses’ Ethiopian
wife differed from the race and skin color of the Jews (Jeremiah 13:23). God severely
rebuked Miriam and Aaron for challenging Moses for the leadership of the nation
and brought leprosy upon Miriam (Numbers 11:1-16). Implicitly, God did not share
the sentiments of Miriam and Aaron regarding interracial marriage, per se, as well
as strenuously objected to their challenge of Moses, irrespective of the basis on
which they proposed to challenge Moses. The principle here involving racial
marriage (i.e., God has no investment one way or the other regarding
interracial marriage) is not countermanded by any other Old or New Testament
passages and is applicable today ¾ religiously. No New
Testament passages specifically address interracial marriage. Second Corinthians
6:14-18 concerns relationships (e.g., social, business, religious, marriage, etc.)
whereby an intimate association with those whose non-Christian influence
overpowers one’s Christianity. The passage, though, does not address race or
skin color and does not apply to the question at hand. New Testament marriage
rules appear in Matthew 5:32-32; 19:1-9; Romans 7:1-3; 1 Corinthians 7 and none
of these passages address racial marriage. Summarized,
there are no applicable regulations in the Bible that prohibit interracial
marriage today. There are, though, social considerations that may ill affect interracial
marriages that ought to be weighed before entering such, to ensure that those
marriages do not end in divorce. Additional to the peer pressure that doubtless
buffets spouses who enter interracial marriages, the same societal pressures will
affect children born to such a union and must also be considered. Still, the
choice resides with the individuals who propose to marry and is not prohibited by
the Word of God. I am a
member of the church at East Huntsville church of Christ in Huntsville,
Alabama. As I was reading James 5:14-16, I started to wonder if an elder, or
anyone, could pray for the forgiveness of my sins. I also wondered, if I had
sinned for a long time, even until I was hardened to my sins, would I have to
get a faithful person to rejoin me with God, or could I just pray to him in
private for the forgiveness of my sins. This also made me wonder why when we go
"forward" the preacher ask God to forgive us. Would God not forgive
us, the erring sinner, if the preacher, or a faithful person didn't intercede? James
5:14-18 reads as follows: “Is any
sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray
over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord: And the prayer of
faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have
committed sins, they shall be forgiven him. Confess your faults one to another,
and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent
prayer of a righteous man availeth much. Elias was a man subject to like
passions as we are, and he prayed earnestly that it might not rain: and it
rained not on the earth by the space of three years and six months. And he
prayed again, and the heaven gave rain, and the earth brought forth her fruit” (James
5:14-18). The
type of prayer with which the context of James 5:14 forward begins is
associated with miraculous healing ability that was available to the infant
church of the first century. The anointing with oil in conjunction with the
attendance of these miraculously endowed elders was symbolic (since olive oil
would be entirely ineffective from a purely medical perspective for any number
of medical maladies, then or now) and companion to the miraculous healing. Outside
of the consideration of the reference to miraculous healing, it is a New
Testament teaching that Christians should pray for each other (inclusive of the
elders). The text above reads “pray one for another.” By implication, the apostles
of Christ in Acts 8 complied with the request of Simon (formerly the sorcerer)
and prayed for him that his sins would be forgiven him. “Repent
therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought
of thine heart may be forgiven thee. For I perceive that thou art in the gall
of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity. Then answered Simon, and said, Pray
ye to the Lord for me, that none of these things which ye have spoken come
upon me” (Acts 8:22-24). The
James passage implies penitence upon the part of the recipient of prayer and
the latter passage in Acts specifically mentions repentance. Prayer for forgiveness
of sin, by one seeking forgiveness as well as by those who would pray with us
for the forgiveness of sin, must be preceded by repentance. Sins
that are committed secretly should be the subject of private prayers. However,
when our sins are public (known), and thereby reflect unfavorably upon the
church (and those who comprise it ¾ other Christians), we sin
against the church and the brethren, too. When repenting of public sins,
penitent souls need to request forgiveness from fellow Christians also, who
then should gladly forgive (2 Corinthians 2:6-7). Coming forward, at which time
a preacher words a prayer, constitutes acknowledgement of repentance by the one
coming forward and the extension of forgiveness by the brethren. All
participate in the prayer, irrespective of whether the prayer is led by a
preacher, an elder or someone else ¾ as in the case of all
public prayers. James
5:17-18, along with the preceding verses, emphasizes the efficiency of prayer
to enlist the providence of God. Prayer is a frequent topic throughout the Bible
and especially in the New Testament. Some form of the word “prayer” appears
about 563 times in the Bible, besides other terms also used for prayer. Some references
to these prayers are: “I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers,
intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men” (1 Timothy
2:1). “Pray without ceasing” (1 Thessalonians 5:17). Prayer should be a chief
characteristic of each child of God and we should likewise covet the prayers of
our brethren, too. |
rushmore@gospelgazette.com | https://www.gospelgazette.com/ | webmaster@gospelgazette.com |