Communion: One Cup vs. Multiple Cups

We are currently struggling with an issue concerning Communion. Is it okay to use individual cups, or do we have to drink out of one cup? Your opinion would be greatly appreciated, because it’s really a problem issue within our church. Thanks. In Christ, Harry S Sadly, the question you pose is one that has needlessly buffeted many congregations. The problem stems from the laudable desire to appeal to biblical authority coupled with an unfortunate misunderstanding of how to interpret language in general and biblical language in particular. For the most part, the same procedures by which one would understand language used daily, including among family members, is the same basis by which one correctly understands God’s message in the Bible. Whereas even children typically understand the daily language about them, often people bring an artificial ignorance to biblical interpretation. For instance, almost no one of any age beyond toddlers has any difficulty at all understanding the difference between figurative and nonfigurative language as we speak to one another daily. Yet, interject Bible text into a discussion and even otherwise accomplished adults stumble over words and meanings that outside of a religious context every elementary school student understands. The foregoing, generally, is precisely the problem of whether in communion a congregation is authorized to use multiple cups or is restricted to sharing the same, single cup. The troubling words “the cup” referring to communion appear in several New Testament passages (Matthew 26:26-29; Mark 14:23-25; Luke 22:15-20; 1 Corinthians 10:16, 21; 11:23-29). However, even an …

Communion Twice on Sunday

I have a relative in another state who has been worshipping at a congregation where the elders have decided that all members should partake of the Lord’s Supper twice each Sunday. Have you ever heard of this before? If you have time, please send me your thoughts on this. I know “there is nothing new under the sun,” but I have never heard of this before. Thanks for your comments. In Christ, Ken Gardner While I have heard brethren think out loud respecting the observance of communion at each worship period on Sundays, this is my first knowledge of any congregation implementing this practice. Doubtless, those who propose this dual observance of the Lord’s Supper on Sunday, corresponding with assembling twice on Sunday which most congregations do, are sincerely trying to be guided by the New Testament and please God. Such persons’ sincerity and devotion to God are not questioned. The apostle Paul corrected abuses in the church of God at Corinth regarding its observance of the Lord’s Supper (1 Corinthians 11:20-30). In that context, among other admonitions, the apostle wrote: “For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord’s death till he come” (1 Corinthians 11:26). He addressed the manner (1 Corinthians 11:27, 29 ‘worthily’) in which the communion was to be observed, but he did not stipulate the frequency, surely because they needed no correction about the frequency of observance (i.e., frequency was not part of the Corinthian error). However, brethren who contemplate observing communion twice on …

Husband of One Wife

I enjoy your web page. I was searching for an article on deacons, found it, but it didn’t answer my question which is, is a divorced man, who has a scriptural divorce and is remarried, able to be a deacon? The question is an issue; some say yes, some say the scriptures aren’t specific about this. One qualification, the husband of one wife. Would appreciate your thoughts and scripture on this. Thank you for your time, a sister in Christ, Zella Bluthardt Commentators are not unanimous as to whether the biblical phrase “husband of one wife” prohibits polygamy or a second marriage for those who would be elders (1 Timothy 3:2) or deacons (1 Timothy 3:12). For instance, Albert Barnes and Adam Clarke view the phrase as pertaining to polygamy, not biblically lawful second marriages. (1) It is the most obvious meaning of the language, and it would doubtless be thus understood by those to whom it was addressed. At a time when polygamy was not uncommon, to say that a man should “have but one wife” would be naturally understood as prohibiting polygamy. (2) The marriage of a second wife, after the death of the first, is nowhere spoken of in the Scriptures as wrong. The marriage of a widow to a second husband is expressely declared to be proper (1 Cor 7:39); and it is not unfair to infer from that permission that it is equally lawful and proper for man to marry the second time. But if …

What Happened to Job’s Wife?

I would like to know what happened to Job’s wife. I know what kind of woman she was, but I don’t know whatever happened to her. Thank you, Kartinia Morton, Washington, D.C. The Bible does not address what became of Job’s wife. In the conclusion of the Book of Job (chapter 42), Job was wonderfully blessed by God, which offset Job’s former losses. Job’s physical wealth doubled. Also, Job was blessed with seven sons and three daughters. The mother of a godly man’s children is the man’s wife. Since there is no indication that Job, for whatever reason, married a different wife than the one mentioned earlier in the Book of Job, apparently she enjoyed the same blessings Job did, especially the ten children. Otherwise, respecting details we wish we knew that the Bible does not address, we must take Deuteronomy 29:29 to heart, which says: “The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.”

Baptismal Regeneration

Do you folks believe in baptismal regeneration and are you Campbellites? Thanks ~ Cheryl Dee, Australia Mr. Rushmore, I was searching the internet and ran across your page. I saw that you taught “Baptismal Regeneration”. I was wandering how the “Church of Christ”, “Mormons”, and “Catholics” view the converts in Acts 10 that were saved by faith, ‘before’ water baptism. The bible says only those who obey God may recieve the Holy Ghost (Acts 5:32). examples: Before dealing with the questions regarding “baptismal regeneration,” let me briefly respond to the notion that others and I religiously are “Campbellites.” The appellation “Campbellites” is a derisive slur that historically has been assigned to the Disciples of Christ, the Christian Church and the churches of Christ by their antagonists. I hope that is not the spirit in which this question is posed and that your choice of words is an honest, uninformed oversight. Thomas Campbell and his son, Alexander Campbell, were Presbyterians and later identified with Baptists before opting to go behind denominationalism and attempt to practice New Testament Christianity by relying solely on the New Testament for religious instruction. However, preceding them by several years in independent efforts were James O’Kelly (formerly a Methodist), Abner Jones (formerly Baptist), Elias Smith (formerly Baptist), Barton Stone (formerly Presbyterian) and others, too. Between the latter years of the 1700s through the 1800s, in the United States and Europe, religious people left various denominations by the tens of thousands to practice predenominational, simple New Testament Christianity. …

Transferring of Spirits

Do you have any information of transferring of spirits? Can a person protect themselves from this? If so, how? ~ Regina A. Postley The contemporary religious jargon of “transferring of spirits” refers to the belief that: (1) Bible miracles still occur today, (2) those miracles may be good or bad, (3) owing to either the Holy Spirit or evil spirits respectively indwelling a person, and (4) especially indwelling by evil spirits may be involuntary by the person possessed by evil spirits. “As much as it is a fact that the Holy Spirit is given through the laying on of hands, it is also a fact that daily evil spirits are also transferred from one person to the other.” (Harold F. Weitsz, Little Falls Christian Centre, Zambia) Further, what is attributed to be transferring of an evil spirit into a person: (1) really is the effect of engaging in sin, (2) purports to be an uncontrollable outburst, (3) is a means of controlling persons and preventing them from coming under the influence of other religious leaders, (4) is deduced from even medical illnesses, and (5) diminishes personal responsibility for one’s sinful conduct. Note the following excerpts pertaining to these points. A young and innocent girl meets a boy and has an illegitimate affair with him. The change of her character is instantaneous. She becomes rebellious to her parents and develops a life of failure and misfortune. … A man is convinced to partake in corrupt financial deals and become part of …

Love Your Wife

Do you remember the first wedding you ever attended? It was probably one that your parents made you go to when you were so young you did not even understand what was really happening to the people involved. Do you remember the first time you gave serious consideration to the vows in a marriage ceremony? One of the first things that impressed me was the encouragement for the husband to cherish “manly affection” for his new bride. That phrase is a challenge to any husband through the course of the years of marriage. With the various problems facing our society, it is difficult for a husband to know how to demonstrate his “manly affection” for his wife. The text of Ephesians 5:23-31 teaches every husband about the love he should foster and maintain for his wife. Our study will center on six things every husband’s love should include in cherishing a “manly affection” for his wife. (1) Love of administration. Verse 23 teaches the husband is to be the head of the wife. He is to lead his family so that every member can reach the fullest potential. He is to oversee the education of the family members, he is to lead each member to develop his spiritual potential, he is to keep close watch on the financial situation, and he is to provide for the emotional well-being for his wife and children. He may delegate responsibilities to others, but he is always aware of what is going on and of …

Forgotten Men of the Bible: Jethro

We know much about many Bible characters. Such people are the subject of frequent studies and may even have whole books or chapters of books devoted to them and the lessons we can learn from them. There are other people mentioned in the Bible about whom we know very little. These people may only be mentioned in passing or are found in only one or two places in the Bible. Often these people are overlooked, yet they appear in our Bible for a reason. John 20:30-31 tells us that Jesus did many things that were not recorded in the Bible. The things that were recorded are to strengthen our faith. Second Timothy 3:16-17 tells us that everything in the Bible is from God and is for our learning. With this in mind, there can be no doubt that these little known, forgotten men and women of the Bible can teach us valuable lessons today. In the Old Testament, we read of many men who were considered by God to be men of great faith (Hebrews 11). One of these men, Moses, was given some advice by another who was not an Israelite. Who would consider giving instruction to a man called by God? The answer is Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law. The first mention of this man is in Exodus 2:16-21. Here we find Moses has fled Egypt and the wrath of Pharaoh to the land of Midian. At a well, Moses assists seven daughters of the priest of Midian. Their father, Reuel, invites …

The Old Covenant Versus the New Covenant

Take your Bible and turn through it slowly. Do you notice anything? You should notice at first that it is made up of chapters and verses and that these chapters make up different books. You should also notice that all of these sixty-six books are grouped in two sections. These sections are commonly referred to as the Old Testament and the New Testament. However, what is the difference between them? Why are they divided into two different sections? Which one do we live by today? The Bible is divided into two different sections because there are two different covenants that man has lived under over time. The Old Testament is a record of the Old Covenant that God made with the people of Israel until “the fullness of the time was come” (Galatians 4:4). The New Testament is the New Covenant that God made with the world to bring man to salvation. Then, why have two covenants?  What are the differences, and how do we know which covenant man is under today? A covenant is “a compact or agreement between two parties.”1 In our particular discussion, it is an agreement between God and man. The Old Covenant is the Law of Moses under which Israel existed and lived. The New Covenant is that by which Christians live and fellowship with God. The New Covenant is an agreement between Christ and individuals this side of the cross throughout the Christian dispensation. The covenant relationship is part of God’s great scheme of redemption …

The Wages of Sin

A valuable lesson to communicate to youngsters is that actions have consequences. Sinful conduct has serious negative consequences, but moral conduct produces positive results. That is what Paul was getting at when he wrote, “The wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord” (Romans 6:23). It is generally believed that it is impossible to live an exciting, joyous and fulfilled life while at the same time serving Christ. That’s simply not true. I would argue that it is impossible to live a full and meaningful life unless one is a Christian. Jesus saith that he had come that we “might have life” and that life in him is “abundant” (John 10:10). To live life fully, we must live it as Christians. Many today do not know, but Jesus knew that God’s laws were given to enrich life. When the Word of God prescribes a certain type of conduct, we can be confident that life will be more rewarding if we listen. When the Bible prohibits something, it is because it is in our best interest to avoid it. If we don’t, we should be prepared to face the consequences. Adam and Eve were driven from the garden because they did not listen to God. With their transgression, sin entered the world. As a result of sin, they were separated from God. Life became difficult. Death — eternal separation from God — became a reality. What God had pronounced as very …

Barsabas Was a Great Man, Too

Having fallen from grace, Judas soon thereafter fell headlong a corpse and a reminder of the depths to which sin will take an individual (Acts 1:17-20). Though he had a part in the ministry of God the Son, he chose a commission as henchman in the army of perdition. His death, as an apostle, left a void in the ranks of the handpicked, special followers of Jesus (Acts 1:20). By divine guidance (Acts 1:24, 26), the apostles chose a man among men to pick up the armor vacated by the deserter. The man chosen, Matthias, was a great man. This is obvious, for his appointment was based on his spiritual character (Acts 1:21). However, what of the man Barsabas, about whom very little is spoken? Was he not also a great man? He was faithful to Christ (Acts 1:22). Swete explains faithfulness to Christ (as in Revelation 2:10) as proving “…thyself loyal and true, to the extent of being ready to die [for Christ’s sake”] (The Apocalypse of St. John). Faithful suggests reliability and trustworthiness, as well as submissiveness. All of this describes Barsabas. From the ministry of the Baptizer to the ascension of the Savior, Barsabas was numbered among the disciples. Apparently, he withstood even the difficult teachings of Christ (see John 6:66-69). He did not turn away, even after the seeming defeat of Calvary (Acts 1:22). Faithfulness is, in God’s eyes, a sign of greatness. He was recognized as a spiritual leader (Acts 1:23). This is very subjective. The author …

Have You Been to Calvary?

The late and esteemed Foy Smith preached a moving sermon entitled, “Have You Been to Calvary?” The word “Calvary” (Luke 23:33, KJV) or “Golgotha” (Mark 15:22) means “the place of a skull,” referring to the site of Jesus’ crucifixion. Where was Calvary? Jesus died in 30 A.D., but in 70 A.D., when General Titus’ soldiers had demolished Jerusalem, “It was so thoroughly laid even with the ground . . . that there was left nothing to make those that came thither believe it had ever been inhabited” (Josephus, WARS 7, 1, 1). Not a stone was left on top of another (Matthew 24:2). Where was Calvary? A rebuilt Jerusalem again rebelled against Rome under Bar Kochba in 135 A.D., but again Jerusalem was destroyed, this time by Emperor Hadrian (117-138 A.D.). Where was Calvary? On the old site, Hadrian built a pagan city, naming it “Aleia Capitolina,” and erected there a temple to Jupiter Capitolinus. Under pain of death, no Jew was allowed in the city, nor even to stand at a distance to view the place of old Jerusalem (Albert Henry Newman, A Manual of Church History, I, 154). Where was Calvary? Constantine, the first emperor to be converted to Christianity, determined in 325 A.D. to find the site of Calvary, ordering Bishop Macarius of Aelia to locate both Jesus’ death site and his burial place. Macarius prayed, and allegedly the exact locations were miraculously revealed. Constantine’s mother, the Empress Helena, on sending a large number of workmen to the …

Child Abuse

Women who have abortions can be forgiven, and our merciful and loving God will forgive them when they do what he requires for pardon. Spiritually strong people should have compassion for those who get caught up in the frustrations of their sins that cause abortions. But, spiritually strong people should also let their love and compassion work by trying to get people not to do the things that lead to abortion. Child Abuse The reports in the mass media on child abuse in the United States are appalling. It is hard to believe that there are some people in our enlightened and educated society that have done the cruel things that they have been doing to children. One of the worst forms of child abuse is abortion. Maybe it is the worst form because evidently in most cases of abortion the child does not even have a chance to cry in objection to his death! Horrifying Facts In the Kennedy-Falwell debate at the National Religious Broadcasting Convention in Washington, D.C., on February 5, 1985, I heard Dr. Jerry Falwell say there are 4,000 abortions per day in the United States. Only about one percent of these babies being killed were conceived as the result of incest and rape. So, the argument for abortion based on the fact that some aborted babies were conceived as a result of the sins of incest and rape is not a strong case for abortion. Even if abortion were justified in cases of incest and …

The Emotions of Jesus

In addition to possessing a divine nature, Jesus Christ was also flesh and blood (John 1:14), a human being. He thus shared with us the full range of human emotions. He could be happy or sad. What circumstances of life made our Lord weep? What made him joyful? A study of this theme is both thrilling and rewarding. The book of Isaiah prophetically speaks of the Lord Jesus as “a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief” (53:3). Three times in the New Testament, there is the record of Jesus weeping. Let us consider each of these. 1. John 11:35 poignantly states: “Jesus wept.” The Greek term for “wept” is dakruo, used only in this New Testament passage. It literally means, “to shed tears.” It suggests a silent, tender weeping. The occasion of this touching scene is in connection with the death of Lazarus. What precipitated the Master’s tears at this time? It was surely not the grief of hopelessness (cf. 1 Thessalonians 4:13), for Lazarus was in a better state of being. Nor was it a weeping of loneliness, for the Lord knew that his friend would be with his family and associates presently. Some have suggested that Jesus wept because he recognized that he would be bringing Lazarus back to a life of hardship (cf. John 12:10). More likely, however, is the view which suggests that Christ wept out of pure sympathy for those whose hearts were breaking at this time. John writes: “When Jesus therefore saw her weeping, …

The Habitation of God

In Ephesians 2:19-22, the grand old Apostle Paul spoke of Christians being fellow citizens with the saints and members of the family of God. Then changing the figures of speech that he was using to that of a building, or a Temple, he said that we are built on the foundation laid by the apostles and prophets with Jesus Christ himself being the chief cornerstone. He went on to say that the whole building fitly joined together grows into a holy temple in Christ, and that it is in him that the Christian is being (notice the present tense) built together for a habitation of God in the Spirit. There are many things in this periphrastic rendering of these verses that would be profitable for study, but today we wish to look at the fact that Christians are built together for a “habitation of God in the Spirit.” During the dispensation of Moses, the people in whom God dwelt, by dwelling in the Temple which they had built for him, were the people of Israel. For many generations these people were the “chosen” of God and held the unique position of having a very special relationship with him because of who they were. In the dispensation of grace, God no longer dwells among a physical people such as he did in the days of the Law of Moses, but he dwells in a spiritual Temple which is made of living stones. This spiritual Temple is also known as “a chosen …

How Can There Be “Evil” from the Lord?

(Glad Tidings of Good Things, Vol. 6/Nov. 15, 2001) Sometimes students of the Bible are shocked and confused to read in the Scriptures that the Holy Spirit at times describes the thoughts and actions of God as “evil.” For example, in the Book of Jeremiah alone we read that Jehovah “brought” evil (Jeremiah 4:6), he “thought to do” evil (18:8), he “framed” evil (18:11), he “pronounced” evil (26:13, 19), he “purposed to do” evil (36:3), and he “did” evil (42:10). In each of these passages, both the King James Version and American Standard Version of 1901 speak of the “evil” that the Lord planned and/or carried out. First, there are a number of words used in the Bible that have more than one meaning. Their meaning in a particular instance in the Scriptures must be determined by the context in which they appear. So it is with the word “evil.” When we read the word “evil,” perhaps our first thought is that this signifies wickedness, sinful action, that which is wrong or evil from a moral point of view. The word “evil” does carry such a meaning in many biblical passages. For instance, in the days of Noah the thoughts of man’s heart were only “evil” continually (Genesis 6:5). Is the Lord God guilty of thinking and doing that which is “evil” in a moral sense — does he do that which is wrong? Consider three biblical statements that show that God could never think or act in an evil …

Men of the Bible

[The wordsearch puzzle is NOT Interactive and must be printed to use.]

Men of the Bible

[The crossword puzzle is interactive through your Internet browser.] You need Java enabled to view the crossword applet. Solution Web page created by Crossword Compiler.

Planted in the Court

During Bible times, many of the wealthier individuals lived in a home with several rooms. These rooms would be built around a central courtyard. All of the rooms would have a door into this courtyard. The courtyard usually did not have a roof over it. At times, a temporary cover would be put up over part of it to shade from the sun or from heavy rain. Trees and other plants would be planted in this courtyard to make it beautiful. Also, the fruit from the trees could be used for food. These plants and trees would be taken very good care of since they were considered a part of the home and the owner did not want to have to replace any of them. These trees and plants were kept healthy. The trees would produce fruit for many years. In Psalm 92:13-14, we read, “Those that be planted in the house of the Lord shall flourish in the courts of our God. They shall still bring forth fruit in old age; they shall be fat and flourishing.” Those who live like God wants them to live are like the trees planted in the courtyard. They are taken care of by God. They will flourish and do well. These individuals will not quit producing fruit in their old age. They will continue to do what they can for the Lord no matter how old they are. Make sure you are planted in the court of God. Study God’s Word and …

Grass on the Housetop

In New Testament times the roofs of most homes were flat. In many instances, the roof was used as an extra room. People would sleep on the roof in the summertime. Many meals were also eaten on the roof. The homes were many times made of mud and clay bricks. Since the roofs were flat, it was easy for seeds to take root and grow. During the rainy season, it was not uncommon for grass to grow on the roofs. But the grass would not last long. When the heat of summer came, the grass would die from the heat. The enemies of God are compared to this grass. In Psalm 129:6, we read, “Let them be as the grass upon the housetops, which withereth afore it groweth up.” The grass would grow with the rains but it never got very tall because the summer heat made it wither and die. Sometimes it seems like those who are against God and his Word, the Bible, have all the pleasures and success of life. It may appear that they are the green grass of life. But their riches and success are only short lived. When the Judgment Day comes, they will wither as the green grass on the housetop in summertime. They will have to spend eternity with Satan in. I know you do not want to be like the grass on the housetop. I know you want to live eternally with God in heaven. The only way to do that …

Is Capital Punishment Scriptural and Therefore Right?

In 1984, leaders of thirteen denominational churches in Florida signed a joint-declaration condemning the death penalty. This document characterized capital punishment as being inconsistent with God’s love. They did not and could not say, however, that it is inconsistent with God’s Word. Nor could they charge Scripture with inciting the evils that they lodged against capital punishment. Consider for a moment the title of this article. It isn’t, “Is Capital Punishment Political?” It is. Newsweek reports that “…capital punishment in Texas is in the cross hairs this political season” (June 12, 2000, p. 26). It isn’t, “Is Capital Punishment Popular?” According to a recent Newsweek poll, it is supported by 73% of Americans (Newsweek, June 12, 2000, p. 27). This statistic is in all probability higher since “People who work in the news media are overwhelmingly opposed to the death penalty…” (John Leo, U.S. News & World Report, July 3, 2000, p. 14). It isn’t, “Is Capital Punishment Controversial?” It is and always has been controversial. The question is, “Is Capital Punishment Scriptural and Therefore Right?” By scriptural, I mean that the Bible furnishes us with the objective standard by which to determine the legitimacy of this very controversial question (2 Timothy 3:16-17). Capital punishment comes from a Latin expression meaning punishment that takes the head, and hence, the life of a person. It means that life, for what is regarded justifiable reason, is legally taken by the existing form of government under which one lives. Executions in this country are relatively rare compared to …

Christ Is Coming Again

To the faithful child of God there are many precious promises of Scripture, the fulfillment of which are eagerly awaited. The one promise that will open the door to the fulfillment of all remaining promises is that of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. That the Word of God clearly assures this fact cannot be successfully denied. Yet, there are those who scoff at the promise. There are those who falsely teach that his Second Coming has already occurred. There are those who in error teach that his Second Coming will be followed by a third coming, at which time he is to establish a physical, earthly kingdom over which he will rule from the city of Jerusalem. These errant suggestions have no place in Scripture, but are rooted in the fanciful traditions and doctrines of men (Matthew 15:9-13). We can know that Christ has not yet come, because the Bible teaches that “He is coming with clouds, and every eye shall see Him, even they who pierced Him” (Revelation 1:7). It is the true case that our eyes have not yet seen him. Certainly there has been no news coverage by television and radio of such an event. Since none have seen him come, it is evident that he has not yet come. As well, we can know that Christ is not coming the second time in order to establish his kingdom, because his kingdom has already been established. It was successfully established on the day of Pentecost during …

Sweat the Small Stuff

Some religious people feel that as long as one has a sincere heart, the “little” details do not make much difference. Yet, we don’t think this way about other matters which are not of eternal consequences. Consider: If 99.9 percent is good enough, then … Two million documents will be lost by the IRS this year. 811,000 faulty rolls of 35 mm film will be sold this year. 22,000 checks will be deducted from the wrong bank accounts in the next 60 minutes. 1,314 phone calls will be misplaced by telecommunication services every minute. 12 babies will be given to the wrong parents each day. 268,500 defective tires and 14,208 defective personal computers will be shipped this year. 403,260 tax returns will be returned incorrectly this year. 2,488,200 books will go out every 12 months with the wrong cover. 5,517,200 cases of soft drinks produced in the next 12 months will be flatter than a bad tire. Two plane landings daily at O’Hare Airport will be unsafe. 3,056 copies of tomorrow’s Wall Street Journal will be missing one of three sections. 18,322 pieces of mail will be mishandled next hour.  880,000 credit cards in circulation will turn out to have incorrect cardholder information on their magnetic strips. $9,690 will be spent today, next Thursday, and every day in the future on defective, often unsafe sporting equipment. 55 malfunctioning automatic teller machines will be installed in the next 12 months. 20,000 incorrect prescriptions will be written this year. 114,500 mismatched shoes will be …

God Bless America

Many of the first settlers who flocked to the shores of America came seeking religious freedom. Further, the laws that our founding fathers made to govern this nation were often based on biblical principles. At one time, the United States of America was referred to as a Christian nation. (Strictly speaking, of course, since mankind has freewill and as long as he continues to make wrong spiritual choices, no nation will ever truly be a Christian nation.) Few reflective souls would seriously doubt that America has been wonderfully blessed by Almighty God over the past two centuries or so. It was no wonder that in former years when facing great trials, our nation petitioned God on bended knee in prayer. However, do we as a nation, as individuals or even as the church, have a right today to expect God to grant our plea that he bless America? “Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD; and the people whom he hath chosen for his own inheritance” (Psalm 33:12). “Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people” (Proverbs 14:34). Today America is far from being a Christian nation. First, the face of religion in America has changed. There has been a great influx of other world religions into our nation, including: Judaism, Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism. American denominationalism in so-called Christianity has greatly expanded and in the process significantly diminished its reliance on biblical principles. Increasingly, the American population is at best indifferent to religion and at worst has embraced practical atheism. Consequently, our country is guilty of many …