David R. Kenney
Recently, I read a discussion about the tradition of extending the invitation at the end of sermons. Some viewed it as something that has become passé, unnecessary or even unscriptural. Some pointed out there is not an example of the invitation in the New Testament. However, has anyone considered how few complete sermons are recorded? Of the sermons recorded, these were interrupted by an immediate response. Some have become “anti-traditionalists” and seek to trouble churches. Is it really the case that there is no authority for extending an invitation? Can one believe it would be “unscriptural” to give someone the opportunity to respond? The invitation is a call to action. What about when Jesus said, “Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls” (Matthew 11:28–29 NKJV)? The invitation to obey the Gospel is always open. The conclusion of a sermon is subjective, but that does not mean that extending the invitation is without authority. Some suggest a change to something else, but what exactly would that be? There are always responses to the invitation (public or private)—positive or negative. What will your response be?
![]()