Home | Archives | Guest Book | Links | churches of Christ | Contact Us
|
|
Serving an international
|
|
Vol. 9 No.
5 May 2007 Page 2
|
|
Current Issue: Go to Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 |
The
theme of this article we owe to the words of our Lord in Matthew 12:25,
when he
said, “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation;
and every
city or house divided against itself shall not stand” (KJV). In this
writing,
we purpose to examine historical division among people of God in the
Bible, to
note God’s perspective on division among the people of God and to
ascertain if
God ever approves of division among the people of God.
Religious
division involving the people of God is a sad historical fact dating
back to
mankind’s very debut on planet earth. Regrettably, religious division
among the
people of God continues to the present. Furthermore, there is no
indication
that religious division will not continue to occur from time to time
among the
people of God. Sadly, in addition, sometimes religious division will
come
between the people of God and God himself.
We
emphasize, though, that God has always disapproved of religious
division
involving the people of God. Sin is involved in every religious
division among
the people of God! Though God hates all sin, division among brethren is
an
abomination to God (or more hated by God).
Since
God hates religious division involving the people of God, does God ever
approve
or even require religious division? Some tender souls may assume that
God never
approves or even requires religious division among the people of God,
but they
would be incorrect in that assumption. Today, it is popular to assign degrees
of guilt to all parties in every confrontation or division (e.g.,
degrees
of fault in an auto accident). It is true that all persons involved in
religious division may be sinning.
However, the thoughtful soul realizes in some instances not all
of the
disputants are not guilty of sin. Rather, God would hold them
accountable for
sin for not pursuing a course of action that results in religious
division.
Let’s look at the anatomy of religious division from a biblical
perspective.
Sadly,
the people of God have been involved in religious division from
mankind’s first
appearance on earth through the present. The very first occasion of
religious
division involving the people of God was in the Garden of Eden (Genesis
3).
Adam and Eve were the people of God. Religious division arose between
the first
pair and God because of sin. Sin always separates between God and
sinners
(Isaiah 59:1-2). What could God have done more to avoid being a party
to this
religious division, or was God partly responsible for the religious
division
between himself and the first pair?
The
second occasion of religious division on earth between the people of
God
involved Cain and Abel (Genesis 4). Cain and Abel each offered worship
to God.
God accepted Abel’s worship and rejected Cain’s worship (Genesis 4:4-5;
Hebrews
11:4). Consequently, Cain and Abel were religiously divided, to the
extent that
Cain murdered his brother, Abel (Genesis 4:8). What should Abel have
done to
appease his brother, Cain, to avoid religious division and prevent his
death?
The
next occasion of religious division among God’s people was between God
and Noah
on one hand versus almost all humanity on the other hand (Genesis 6-8).
The
biblical account of the flood in Noah’s day occurred under the
family-type
religion known as Patriarchy. The father of each family was responsible
for
guiding his family religiously in accordance with what God had revealed
or
continued to reveal from time to time about his will. Whatever the
population
of earth was in Noah’s day, only eight righteous souls boarded the ark
and the
rest of the population on the planet died in the universal flood (1
Peter
3:20). What could God and Noah have done more without compromising with
sin to
not appear holier-than-thou or sanctimonious and be a part of religious
division? To ask is to answer; the question is rhetorical—nothing
more could
have been done.
Another
among many Old Testament divisions between the people of God occurred
between
Korah and his followers opposed to Aaron and Moses (Numbers 16). Korah
and over
250 renown Israelites made baseless accusations against Moses and Aaron
and
demanded to be priests. Religious division was widespread among the
Israelites.
God caused the earth to swallow Korah and is coconspirators as well as
fire to
burn up 250 Israelites who presumptuously offered incense. Should Aaron
and
Moses have gone along to get along so there would be no religious
division? Was
God rash in killing Korah and his cohorts, their families, the 250
Israelite
princes who offered incense and sending a plague among the rest of the
people?
One
very notable division among the people of God was the split between the
ten
northern tribes and the two southern tribes that resulted in the
northern
kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah (1 Kings 12). The
harshness
of Solomon’s son, Rehoboam, was the catalyst (or last straw) for the
division.
However, the ten northern tribes immediately went headlong,
full-speed-ahead
into idolatry (i.e., erecting golden calves and high places). God
evidently
foresaw the wickedness of the ten northern tribes that had the split
not
occurred would have sooner carried away the southern tribes also into
idolatry
(i.e., “this thing is from me,” 1 Kings 12:24). God required this
religious
division to continue, evidently for the good of the people who did not
desert
the dynasty of David.
Both
testaments of the Bible are filled with accounts of religious division
among
the people of God. While God does not desire religious division,
sometimes God
views religious division as necessary to preserve faithful souls. In
other
instances, religious division among the people of God occurs solely
because of
the forwardness of some of the children of God toward their brethren.
In
addition, doubtless there were some scenarios where various parties to
division
shared degrees of guilt.
God
hates religious division, especially among the people of God. Old
Testament
references show that God hates division. God hates sins, but considers
some
sins so distasteful that they are abominations to him (Proverbs
6:16-19). One
of the abominable sins is to sow discord among brethren (Proverbs 6:19).
New
Testament references show that God hates religious division within the
Lord’s
church. Jesus Christ stated a principle about division that is
applicable as
well to the Lord’s church (Matthew 12:25). The apostle Paul repeatedly
and
thoroughly rebuked the church at Corinth for unnecessary religious
division (1
Corinthians 1:10-13; 3:3; 11:18; 12:25; 2 Corinthians 12:20). Religious
division in the first century was widespread and destructive to
Christians and
the church, affecting churches of Christ through the Roman sub-province
of
Galatia (Galatians 5:14-15). Religious division in the first century
commonly
affected many within the church and hindered prayers, as evidence by
the general
epistle of our Lord’s half-brother (James 3:14-16; 4:1-3).
However,
is religious division, even among God’s people, sometimes necessary and
expected by God? Popular thought today demands that guilt for any
confrontation
between parties be attributed to all disputants. However, who could or
would
dare to assign guilt to God for the religious division in the Garden of
Eden
between God and the first pair? No right thinking person would have had
Abel
offer fruits and vegetables instead of what God specified so that
religious
division between his brother, Cain, and him would not have occurred.
Noah was
obligated to participate in religious division in his day by being
righteous
whereas the world was wicked, and by getting on the ark.
Yet,
there is an unsavory, sinful sectarianism within the Lord’s church
today. One
might well refer to sectarianism within the churches of Christ as
“politics” or
“networking.” Essentially, sectarianism within the church involves
failure to
exercise impartiality (i.e., not to be a respecter of persons, Acts
10:34;
Romans 2:11; Ephesians 6:9; Colossians 3:25; 1 Peter 1:17). Biased or
prejudicial treatment of brethren toward other brethren was a big
problem in
the first century church, as it is today, too (James 2:1, 9; Jude 16).
A preacher
has a friend, who has a friend, who has a friend—a network of
friends—any one
of whom if offended garners the displeasure of them all. Sectarianism
within
the church also involves rallying around schools, Gospel journals and
programs
to the exclusion of all perceived competitors, even if disagreement
over
biblical doctrine is not central to the grievance. Some brethren’s
circles of
fellowship have been self-drawn so tightly that they scarcely place
both of
their own feet within them. While neither favorable toward liberal
liberties
with the Word of God nor favorable toward anti-biblical strictures
respecting
the Word of God, Brethren, the type of Christianity practiced by too
many
members of the churches of Christ is gut-wrenching and ulcerating for
no good
reason. True Christianity, while neither leaning to one extreme or
another, is
balanced and a blessing to embrace.
Nevertheless,
there is also necessary division within the Lord’s church today.
Religious
division is necessary when ungodly Christians teach or do things
contrary to
the Gospel and refuse to repent (Galatians 1:6-9). Religious division
is
necessary when some require fellow Christians to capitulate to them in
matters
that are not a matter of biblical doctrine (e.g. antism, seeking
preeminence,
Matthew 15:9; 3 John 9-10). Religious division is necessary when unruly
brethren will not cease and desist their “factious” (ASV)
or “divisive” (NKJV) ways (Titus 3:10-11).
Refusing
to practice religious fellowship with people in error is a form of
necessary,
religious division. Denominationalism is division by definition,
division from
God-authorized religion (Christianity) and division from other
denominations.
Church discipline is a form of division intended not only to rescue
sinners but
to preserve the church from corruption (1 Corinthians 5:5-6).
Identifying or
marking false teachers is a form of religious division for the purpose
of
preventing religious division within the Lord’s church (Romans
16:17-18).
Disassociating with factious Christians is a form of religious division
(Titus
3:10-11).
Biblical
fact: The people of God have been involved in religious division from
mankind’s
first appearance on earth through the present. Biblical fact: God hates
religious division, especially among the people of God. Biblical fact:
Religious division, even among God’s people, is sometimes necessary and
required by God. We must do our best not to be responsible for
unnecessary
religious division, especially among the people of God. However,
faithful
children of God must not knuckle under to anyone who proposes to
corrupt the
Gospel. Faithful Christians must not surrender to divisive and
overbearing
fellow Christians who evidence a purpose to rule or ruin the Lord’s
church.
Faithful Christians must not compromise with weak or ungodly brethren
merely to
get along (i.e., let them have their own way, or the mentality of “If I
don’t
get my way, I’ll take my football and go home!”).
Current Issue: Go to Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 |